Ha! Tea 'n' Danger

Loving, caring, sharing, kindness, compassion, empathy, respect, equality, freedom, peace, critical thinking, logic, reason, understanding, science…

Money & Power

3 responses to “Money & Power

  1. Richard McCargar September 30, 2012 at 2:02 pm

    What’s a realistic alternative to corporations? Chris goes into serious hyperbole and demagoguery on this one.

    Hedges’ idea of an alternative to corporations may be as simple as small locally owned businesses, but I really couldn’t say. I was actually thinking something similar before you posed this question. On a broader scope, I was wondering what his answer in general would be for the state of the world at large? I was wondering if he advocates a resource-based economy (or a natural law-based economy) as suggested by The Zeitgeist Movement and The Venus Project.

    Thanks for stopping in, RM, and for taking the time to comment.

    Peter Parkour

  2. Richard McCargar September 30, 2012 at 2:04 pm

    By the way, when he says that corporations “trash the global economy,” he’s showing that he’s an economic dunce. Corporations are the reason we have a global economy.

    Please, RM, no name calling. Instead, may I recommend saying “he’s wrong” or “he’s incorrect” or “perhaps he misspoke” or something along those lines. I would also offer up another possible angle on the topic. Just because corporations created the global economy, doesn’t mean they aren’t capable of trashing their own creation.

    Peter Parkour

  3. lowerarchy October 1, 2012 at 2:31 am

    The phrase ‘global economy’ can be read two ways: firstly the sum total of all economic activity on the planet, and secondly the more recent phenomenon of neoliberal ‘globalisation’. If read in light of the first definition, Hedges argument means the recent neoliberal practices have damaged all other economic activity. This chimes with the World Systems approach of Immanuel Wallerstein. Due to power differences between rich developed nations and poorer less-developed countries, the weaker areas are always at a disadvantage. Neoliberal policies have further widened this disparity of power and resources, and trade agreements seek to further reinforce these imbalances in favour of the powerful.

    Check out the big brain on lowerarchy. 😉 I was trying to keep things simple and went and took it to a whole new level. Thank you for furthering the conversation and keeping it civil/interesting. 🙂

    Peter Parkour

What say you?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: